Why the
confusion?
Moving the books was difficult, but parting with those that
simply did not fit into our new space was an emotional battle that played
out over a fortnight. Overall, our
libraries complement each other’s well.
I was short on books about metals, warfare, and ceramics, and Tyler
was short on books about textiles (especially needlework), religion in America ,
and history of the book and print culture.
All told, we estimated that we brought over 2,000 books into our new
home. We do not have room for 2,000
books. So after we identified the books
we couldn’t live without and placed them on book shelves, we pruned the
collection and separated the rejects into books to sell/donate to Goodwill
(Bands and Drummerboys of the Civil War and a Catholic
Bible) and books to offer to friends (duplicate copies of Montgomery’s
Textiles in America and Blassingame’s The Slave
Community). There were some
cases where we had to keep two copies of a single book. For example, I own an autographed copy of
Styles’ Dress of the People, and Tyler
owns a copy I gave him and inscribed.
In the case of Demos’ classic A Little
Commonwealth, we owned two revised paperback editions and one
original hardback first edition. We
couldn’t discard the original, and I insisted on keeping the copy with the
revised introduction.
And there were instances in which each of us defended
keeping certain tomes most reasonable people would have discarded. I decided that we
needed both the first and second editions of Krill and Eversmann’s
Early American Decorative Arts (foundational references for
material culture! One of the first books about decorative arts I ever bought!
Beautiful cover on the first edition! I’m cited in the updated
edition!), and Tyler insisted on
keeping his beloved Biesty’s Cross-Sections: Man-Of-War (an
illustrated children’s book he dubbed an “equally valuable reference” in
comparison to Early American Decorative Arts).1
But we don’t just have books. We also have [an]‘tiques.
Pack your stuff as professionally as you can afford. As long as you’re not moving too far and
you’ll be unpacking right away, there is no shame in using cardboard boxes
(which really aren’t “conservation safe”), bubble wrap, and packing paper to swaddle
your gout pots, case photographs, export china, and red mid- (20th-)
century lamps. If you run out of
packing supplies at the last minute, Tyler
suggests using Nicole’s (clean) bath towels to fill in the nooks and crannies.
You’ll be able to stuff a lot of things into cardboard boxes
or, in our case, our “empty space” (chests, trunks, and the like), but some
stuff will need to be carefully transported and carried with minimal packaging
materials by hand (unless you have a
more robust moving budget than we did!).
This means that your friends might be parading some unusual things out
of your truck, into your home, and up your stairs. Thus, you need to be prepared to defend your
antiques collection to the friends who help you move. You might think an early nineteenth-century mousetrap or a cobbler’s bench are cool, but you will likely need to take a
moment to explain why they’re so cool to your friends (you think old mousetraps
are sculptural in the case of the former and you appreciate crafts of all
kinds in the case of the latter).2
On the bright side, having a lot of books means that you
have some bonus display space on top of bookshelves for your antiques.
But when you need to downsize to accommodate your alarm
clock and printer, you need to know the best way to part with some things. How many mid-nineteenth-century glass alcohol
bottles does one really need?
But if you need to downsize, find your local flea market and
set up a stall some Sunday, or take to eBay.
You’ll generate some extra cash, and you won’t be tripping over grenade
boxes or farming implements. Sometimes
it takes moving all the cannon balls into your new place before you can figure
out which ones should stay and which ones need to go.
Notes
1. The final tally:
1,172.
2. Tyler took
his cobbler’s bench to Goodwill; it’s a mid-century reproduction, and he
(surprise) never uses it.
Further Reading
For a recent opinion piece on why and how historians and
other humanists continue to cultivate personal libraries in the days of
digitization, see William Pannapacker, “We’re Still in Love With Books,” The
Chronicle of Higher Education, December 4, 2011.
As a friend of mine says, "you can never have too many books or cool hats."
ReplyDelete